← Back to all posts

Should You Leave Pakistan? An Honest Conversation for Senior Professionals Who Are Thinking About It

A friend called me late one evening. We studied mechanical engineering together at university in Pakistan, graduated the same year, went our separate ways. He stayed. He built a real career inside Pakistan's system. Senior government post. Stability. Respect. A life that works by most measures. And yet the first thing he said was: “Yaar, I feel stuck. Nothing is moving. I am thinking of leaving.”

I have heard a version of this conversation dozens of times. It almost always comes from the people who are actually doing well — the ones with the established careers, the social capital, the families settled and functioning. The ones for whom leaving is not a necessity but a feeling. A restlessness. A sense that somewhere else, the glass is a little more full.

This post is for that person. I am going to go through every myth, every question, every justification I hear in these conversations — and give you my honest verdict on each one. I will back it with data where I have it. I will tell you where I think I am biased. And at the end, I will give you a framework for thinking about this decision clearly, without the noise.

One upfront note: I left Pakistan for Germany, then moved to Saudi Arabia. I have skin in this game and a perspective shaped by that trajectory. That means I have useful experience. It also means I have blind spots. I will flag them as we go.

Everyone Who Left Started from Zero. You Will Start from Minus Ten.

Here is the thing nobody puts clearly enough. When a fresh graduate leaves Pakistan with a master's degree and moves abroad, they start from zero. No career to lose. No social standing to sacrifice. No established income, network, or family routine to disrupt. The reset is free because there was nothing to reset.

You are not that person anymore.

If you are ten or fifteen years into a career in Pakistan — government, private sector, academia — you have built something real. You have a professional reputation that took a decade to earn. You have a social circle that knows who you are. You have family members who depend on your proximity. You have a salary that, in Pakistani terms, actually means something in your community. You have status — the kind that is invisible until it disappears.

When you move abroad at this stage, none of that transfers. Your title does not transfer. Your reputation does not transfer. Your network does not transfer. You arrive as a foreigner with a CV, competing against local candidates who already have the relationships, the language, and the cultural fluency you are still building. You do not start from zero. You start from minus ten.

“Going abroad is not an upgrade. It is a reset. The question is not whether you can handle the reset. It is whether whatever is on the other side is worth the cost of it.” — From the conversation

This does not mean the answer is no. It means the question is different from what most people think it is. It is not “is life better abroad?” It is “is this specific opportunity, in this specific place, worth starting from minus ten for?”

The Myths, the Questions, and the Honest Verdicts

These are the arguments I hear most often. I am going to work through each one directly.

Myth 1

“Pakistan has no future. Things are only getting worse.”

Verdict: Partly wrong, and the timing matters.

Pakistan's economy is in better shape right now than it was two years ago. Inflation averaged 4.49% in 2025, down from 26% the year before. Foreign exchange reserves hit a record $16 billion in January 2025 — over two months of import coverage. The country posted its first fiscal surplus in 24 years in Q1 FY2025. The policy rate has fallen from 22% to 12%. These are not small things. The World Bank describes the picture as stabilization — fragile, but real. Pakistan is not collapsing. It is, quietly, recovering. If you are making a permanent life decision based on a crisis narrative that is already turning, you may be acting on outdated information.

Myth 2

“I will earn so much more abroad. The salary difference is enormous.”

Verdict: True in gross terms. Far less true in net terms.

A senior German civil servant earns roughly €4,500–5,500 gross per month. That looks like 12–16 times what a Pakistani Grade-20 officer earns in base salary. But that comparison is dishonest. A Grade-20 officer in Pakistan does not live on their base salary alone. Add housing allowance (45–55% of salary), car monetization, medical coverage for the family, pension at 70% of last drawn salary, and other in-kind benefits — and the real compensation gap narrows significantly. Meanwhile, in Germany, income tax plus social contributions consume roughly 40–42% of gross salary for a professional in the €60,000–80,000 range. The OECD ranks Germany second highest for tax burden among 38 countries. What arrives in your account after deductions is not what the salary figure suggests.

Myth 3

“Everyone who left is doing brilliantly. My classmates abroad are thriving.”

Verdict: You are seeing survivorship bias in real time.

You see the people on LinkedIn with the European titles and the overseas properties. You do not see the ones who struggled for years, accepted roles below their qualification level, battled loneliness, or quietly came back. A longitudinal study on Pakistani migrants found that emigrants had 35–40% higher consumption than non-migrants — but were less likely to report being happy, calm, or in excellent health. The visible success story and the lived experience are not the same thing. The ones doing brilliantly are real. They are also not representative.

Myth 4

“The Pakistani passport is useless. I need citizenship abroad for my children.”

Verdict: The passport problem is real. The solution is more complex than most people realise.

The Henley Passport Index 2025 ranks Pakistan 103rd out of 227, with visa-free access to just 31 countries. This is a genuine constraint on mobility and professional opportunity. It is also a completely legitimate reason to think about naturalisation abroad. However — and this is important — getting German citizenship now takes a minimum of 5 years of residence (3 for exceptional integration). During those 5 years, you are in the career reset zone. You are not building seniority. You are rebuilding from minus ten. Crucially, as of January 2026, Pakistan officially recognises dual citizenship with Germany — meaning you no longer have to renounce your Pakistani passport to naturalise. That changes the calculation for families with the patience and the financial runway to stay the course. If you are moving primarily for the passport, be honest about whether 5+ years of career reset is a price you are genuinely willing to pay.

Myth 5

“There is no merit in Pakistan. Wasta wins everywhere. I am wasting my potential here.”

Verdict: Partly true — and also exactly as true abroad, just dressed differently.

Wasta is real in Pakistan. Informal networks, family connections, and who-you-know matter enormously. But the idea that abroad it is purely merit-based is a fantasy. In Germany, your informal network — which takes years to build — determines which positions you hear about before they are advertised. In Saudi Arabia, knowing the right people is the entire job market. The hidden job market is not a Pakistani problem. It is a human problem. What changes abroad is that you lose the network you already have in Pakistan and spend years rebuilding one. You are not escaping wasta. You are starting the wasta race from the beginning.

Myth 6

“I will just go for a few years, save some money, and come back.”

Verdict: Almost nobody does this. And they usually do not know it when they leave.

Pakistan sent 832,339 people abroad in 2022 alone — over 2,300 per day, according to published data on the emigration surge. Very few of them had “permanently leave” written in their plan. The few-years plan fails because of children settling into schools, spouses building careers, social roots forming, and the identity shift that happens when you spend five years somewhere. The plan is not dishonest. It is just not realistic about how life actually changes once you are there.

I left Pakistan by choice and have not lived there for over a decade. My read on daily life in Pakistan — the safety nets, the social richness, the career ceiling — is shaped by visits and conversations, not by living it. A government officer in Lahore reading this may find some of my framing naive. If so, they are probably right on those specific points. My experience is in academia and research. I have limited direct visibility into what a senior bureaucrat's career ceiling actually feels like from the inside. Take my assessments on that with appropriate weight.

Saudi Arabia Right Now: Platform or Trap?

Saudi Arabia is where I am, and where I have seen this play out most closely. My honest assessment of the current moment: it is a platform, not a destination, and the window for using it as a platform is narrowing.

Saudiization is accelerating, not slowing. The Nitaqat program's 2025 quotas require 30% Saudi nationals in engineering firms, 40% and rising in accounting, 65% in hospitals. In February 2026, Saudi Arabia announced plans to localise 340,000 additional jobs in the private sector over the next three years. Fourteen million expatriates currently constitute 77% of the Saudi workforce. That number is going to shrink. Not immediately. Not all at once. But the direction is clear and consistent.

14M
Expatriates in Saudi Arabia, 77% of workforce (2025)
340K
Additional jobs to be localised by 2029
65%
Saudiization quota for hospital sector (2025)

This does not mean Saudi Arabia is closed to expats. It means the nature of the opportunity has changed. The people who do well here now are the ones who arrived with a clear purpose, used the tax-free income and lower cost of living to build financial capital quickly, and kept their professional profile strong enough to move when conditions change. They treat it as a platform. Not a final address.

The Middle East more broadly is in a difficult moment. US-Iran tensions, ongoing conflict in Gaza and its regional spillover, Houthi disruption of Red Sea shipping — these are not background noise. Companies in the region are operating conservatively. Hiring for non-essential roles has slowed. Mobility within the region is restricted in ways it was not two or three years ago. If you are planning a move to the Gulf specifically, plan for a more uncertain operating environment than the 2019 or 2021 version suggested.

I am in Saudi Arabia and I have built a life here that works well for me. I have an obvious interest in presenting the Gulf positively. I have tried to be accurate about Saudiization and the current regional instability, but my day-to-day experience is of a country that functions and provides well — and that experience shapes my framing. Someone whose contract was not renewed due to localisation quotas would write a different section here. Both accounts are true.

Germany Will Receive You — But the System Was Built for Someone Younger

Germany is the other conversation I have constantly. It comes up as the “safe” option. Stable system. Rule of law. Good infrastructure. PR pathway. The receiving end of a functioning state.

All of that is true. Germany is genuinely well-run. But it is well-run for a specific type of person, and that person is not a 40-year-old Pakistani professional arriving mid-career.

Germany's system is designed to receive early-career talent and elevate it slowly. You arrive as a student or junior professional, you learn German, you spend years building your local network, you get promoted within an organisation that already knows you. The system rewards patience and integration. It does not fast-track senior professionals arriving from outside who cannot demonstrate the same institutional familiarity.

When I was in Germany, I watched colleagues who arrived as PhDs or postdocs in their late twenties build genuinely strong careers over a decade. I also watched senior professionals who arrived in their forties — expecting to pick up where they left off — spend years in roles below their actual capability level. The difference was not talent. It was the stage of career at which they arrived. The system has a trajectory built into it. If you enter it at the right point, it carries you. If you enter at the wrong point, you are swimming against a current that was not designed to accommodate you.

The language factor compounds this. Reaching B1 German — the minimum for long-term residence — requires around 600 hours of study. That is on top of a full-time job, a family, and the general cognitive load of a new country. B1 is survival. Professional fluency that opens senior roles requires B2 or higher — a different level of investment entirely. Very few people make that investment after 40 while also working full time.

Germany is a good option if you have the patience for it, the language aptitude, and a realistic understanding of the timeline. It is the wrong option if you are expecting it to fix career stagnation quickly. It will not.

The Glass Is Half Full and Half Empty Everywhere

At some point in every one of these conversations, someone says something like: “But you have to admit, life is just better abroad.”

I do not admit that. Not as a blanket statement.

Pakistan has things that nowhere else has. The density of social life. The food. The warmth of relationships that go back decades. The ease of being fully yourself — your language, your faith, your humour — without effort. The speed at which a crisis mobilises a hundred people to help you. These are not small things. They disappear when you leave, and they are very difficult to replace.

Abroad has things Pakistan does not have. Infrastructure that works. Institutions that function without negotiation. Physical safety in ways Pakistan's urban centres cannot guarantee. Freedom of movement. A passport that does not humiliate you at a border. These are also not small things.

“Everyone's glass is half full and half empty. The question is which half you can live without — and which half you cannot live without filling.” — From the conversation

The research supports this. A longitudinal study on Pakistani migrants found higher consumption among emigrants but lower reported happiness, calm, and sense of wellbeing. Financial outcomes improve. Life satisfaction does not necessarily follow. This gap is the thing nobody puts on their mental balance sheet when they are planning the move.

The people I have seen build genuinely good lives abroad are the ones who went with clear eyes about both sides. They knew what they were gaining. They knew what they were giving up. They had made peace with the trade. The people who are miserable abroad — and some are — are usually the ones who expected the move to solve something it was never going to solve.

The Minus Ten Test: A Framework for This Decision

Here is how I think about this when someone brings me this question directly. It is not a scorecard. It is three honest questions, in order.

Question 1: What specifically is wrong, and can it be fixed inside Pakistan?

Is the problem monotony? Ceiling? Safety? Money? Passport? Each of these has a different answer. Monotony and ceiling are career problems, and career problems can sometimes be solved by changing roles, sectors, or cities within Pakistan. Safety is a legitimate reason to leave. Money and passport are real constraints but often overestimated as drivers of life satisfaction. Be specific about what is actually broken before you decide whether leaving is the fix.

Question 2: Do you have a specific offer or opportunity, or are you moving toward a feeling?

A specific offer — a named role, a named institution, a defined salary, a defined timeline — is something you can evaluate. You can run the minus ten calculation against something concrete. A feeling that life is better elsewhere is not a decision. It is a mood. Moving toward a mood is how people arrive somewhere and find that the mood came with them.

Question 3: If you start from minus ten, how long does it realistically take to get back to zero — and is the ceiling above zero worth that journey?

This is the calculation most people never do. For a senior professional moving to Germany, getting back to career parity might take five to eight years of language study, network building, and organisational trust-building. For Saudi Arabia, it might be faster but is now more uncertain. Run the honest numbers. If the ceiling you can reach abroad in ten years is genuinely better than the ceiling you can reach in Pakistan in ten years — and you have a realistic plan for the transition period — then the case for moving is real. If the ceiling is not clearly better, you are paying a very high price for a lateral move.

One thing that has genuinely changed: As of January 2026, Pakistan officially recognises dual citizenship with Germany. This removes the biggest historical objection to German naturalisation for Pakistani professionals — you no longer have to choose. If a German passport for your children is a primary driver and you have the financial runway to spend five years rebuilding in Germany, the path is now cleaner than it has ever been. That is a real change worth factoring in.

Final Thought

My friend on that phone call is not making the wrong call by thinking about this. Feeling stuck after a decade in the same system is normal. Wanting more room to move is human. The question is whether the move he is imagining is actually the thing that fixes the feeling — or whether the feeling will follow him wherever he goes.

In my experience — and I hold this carefully because my sample is biased toward people who talk to me, which skews toward the ambitious and the mobile — the professionals who move abroad and genuinely flourish are the ones who moved toward something specific, not away from something vague. They had a named opportunity, a realistic timeline, and an honest account of what they were leaving behind. They were not running from Pakistan. They were going somewhere in particular.

If you are reading this and you are in that conversation with yourself: do not let anyone tell you the answer is obviously yes or obviously no. Both exist. The right answer depends entirely on the specifics of your situation, your family, your field, your financial position, and what you can honestly tolerate losing. This post is not the verdict. It is the homework you should do before you reach one.

Working Through This Right Now?

If you are at this stage and want to talk through the specifics of your situation — your field, your country options, the realistic timeline — book a short call. I will tell you what I actually think, including the parts that might not be what you want to hear.

Book a 15-Minute Call Send a Message

Related Reading

If the financial reality of life in Europe is something you want to understand in detail before deciding — the taxes, the career ceiling, the faith and family costs — The Hidden Cost of Life in Europe covers it with the data and the honesty this topic deserves.

If you are earlier in your career and weighing whether to pursue a PhD abroad or go straight into industry, this post on the PhD vs industry decision works through a related set of trade-offs that often underlies the same restlessness.

And if you have already decided to move and are looking specifically at Saudi Arabia, this guide on landing an academic job in Saudi Arabia covers the ground-level reality of how that market actually works.